NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000
+85%
4.252 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
861 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GK104
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
