Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (100W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Boost Clock784MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000M +18%
2.496 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M4000M +112%
68
Quadro K4200
32
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
1344
80
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
78.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.496 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
78.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK104
N16E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy