Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000
2.573 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +329%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1664
Shading Units
6144
104
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

49.47 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
80.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
2.573 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
80.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GM204-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

120W
TDP
350W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy