NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+245%
2.15 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1024
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GT200B
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
