Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +791%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
AD104
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy