NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+10138%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
G98
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
