Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M +86%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GM107
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy