Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock924MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE +84%
1.892 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
924 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
900W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy