NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1215MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
+656%
14.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
823 MHz
Base Clock
510 MHz
924 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
1024
Shading Units
5888
64
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
