Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock924MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE +294%
1.892 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
924 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
62W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy