Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1518MHz vs 1098MHz)
Lower TDP (18W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +80%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro P500 Mobile
0.777 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jan 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1455 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1518 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
256
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.29 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.14 GFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
777.2 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.29 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP108
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
18W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy