Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 128MB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 55W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2006
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
NV43
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
NVS440 NPB
Maxwell
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
110 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
31W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy