Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1627MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (868.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro GV100 +1085%
16.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Volta
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1132 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
868.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
208.3 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
520.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.32 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.66 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.330 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GV100
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GV100-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy