NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA A10G
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1710MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
8576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
A10G
+2143%
31.52 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2000M
132
A10G
+2618%
3589
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
1320 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
640
Shading Units
9216
40
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GA102
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
