Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1163MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +677%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
6912
48
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA100
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
400W
250 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy