Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Tesla P6

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Tesla P6

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 16GB VRAM Tesla P6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 90W)
NVIDIA Tesla P6 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1506MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Tesla P6 +614%
6.169 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K620M
18
Tesla P6 +427%
95
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1012 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1506 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.38 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
192.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
96.38 GFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.169 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
192.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GP104
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
GP104-995-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy