NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1650MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+242%
2.957 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K620M
82
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+370%
386
OctaneBench
Quadro K620M
18
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+294%
71
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
TU117B
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
