NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1215MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
+1558%
14.31 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K620M
82
RTX A4500 Embedded
+4680%
3920
OctaneBench
Quadro K620M
18
RTX A4500 Embedded
+2577%
482
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
510 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
384
Shading Units
5888
16
TMUs
184
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM108
GPU Name
GA104
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
17.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
