NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 800W)
NVIDIA Tesla S1070 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
+38%
0.863 TFLOPS
Tesla S1070
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
240
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GT200B
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
