NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1569MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+830%
8.033 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
1316 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GP104
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
