NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1306MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
GRID M10 8Q
+93%
1.672 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GM107
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
GM107-570-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
