NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1600MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
16000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550
+5975%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
16384
24
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
600W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
100 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
