NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1700MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210
+2522%
22.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
64GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
6656
24
TMUs
416
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
