Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 87% (2100MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
14208 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +14106%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
228
384
Shading Units
14592
24
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
MI300
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
146 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
760W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy