NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1395MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
+1058%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
384
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU102
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
