Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K610M
0.376 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded +2094%
8.253 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.920 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
15.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
376.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
15.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
GA107S
N15M-Q2-B-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
Unknown
87 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net