Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +1131%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2880
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GF106
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy