Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 SDI and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (239W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 SDI
5.196 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +165%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2880
Shading Units
7680
240
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
8 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

239W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
3x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 3x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy