NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla P4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 8GB VRAM Tesla P4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla P4 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1114MHz vs 771MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Tesla P4
+60%
5.704 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Tesla P4
+118%
4527
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Tesla P4
+117%
2049
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Tesla P4
+32%
388
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Sep 2016
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
886 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
2304
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
160
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
71.30 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
178.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.12 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.704 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
178.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
GP104-895-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
