NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (1350MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
+133%
8.294 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
+270%
7677
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
+281%
3588
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
+406%
1484
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
600 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
2304
Shading Units
3072
192
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
259.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.59 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
259.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
TU104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
