NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+1918%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2304
Shading Units
64
192
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
59W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
