NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+741%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
2304
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
