NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+455%
3.553 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
0.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
2304
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
10W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GA10B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
