NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 119% (1687MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
+264%
8.637 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5100M
1273
RTX A2000 Mobile
+286%
4917
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5100M
507
RTX A2000 Mobile
+459%
2836
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
1215 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1536
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA107
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
