NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
+314%
2.369 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK107
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
