NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 111% (1627MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
+181%
6.664 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
1192 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
2048
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA107S
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
