Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 172% (2100MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
13056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +5075%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
228
1536
Shading Units
14592
128
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
MI300
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
146 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy