Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +366%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
6144
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy