Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC +565%
2.169 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2013
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

122W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy