Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock784MHz
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200 +58%
2.107 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF110
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy