NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
+104%
2.107 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1344
Shading Units
448
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
238W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF100
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
