NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1215MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
4544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded
+579%
14.31 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K4200
1465
RTX A4500 Embedded
+574%
9884
Blender
Quadro K4200
178
RTX A4500 Embedded
+2102%
3920
OctaneBench
Quadro K4200
32
RTX A4500 Embedded
+1406%
482
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
510 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
1344
Shading Units
5888
112
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA104
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
