NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 180W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 121% (1733MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000
+321%
8.873 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K4200
1465
Quadro P5000
+332%
6335
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K4200
702
Quadro P5000
+313%
2900
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
1607 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1344
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
180W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GP104
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
