NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI60
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 130% (1800MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1024GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI60
+600%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
1024GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.373 TFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Vega 20
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GL
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
