NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GRID K100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 256MB VRAM GRID K100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
+546%
2.107 TFLOPS
GRID K100
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
130W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK107
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
