Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M +32%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1152
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
67.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.627 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
67.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM204
N15E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy