Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4100M +2657%
1.627 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1152
Shading Units
32
96
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
67.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.627 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
67.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G84
N15E-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy