Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800 +4030%
44.78 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2499 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
70
768
Shading Units
4480
64
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
70
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
319.9 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
699.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.56 TFLOPS
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.78 TFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1399 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Navi 31
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy