NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M
+47%
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK107
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
