NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
9600 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
RTX A5500
+3892%
34.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
640
Shading Units
10240
40
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
